Williams v. Faris et al
| Lonnie Williams |
| J. Macomber, J. Barretto, J. A. Baker and S. R. Faris |
| 2:2014cv01434 |
| June 16, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/30/2014 DIRECTING the Clerk to remove the district judge assignment in light of plaintiff's consent, the case is now assigned to Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan; VACATING the findings and recommendations; DENYING plaintiff's 2 application to proceed IFP; and DISMISSING this action, without prejudice, to re-filing upon pre-payment of the $400.00 filing fee. CASE CLOSED. (cc: GEB)(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 06/25/14 ORDERING the clerk of the court randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action. U.S. District Judge Garland E. Burrell randomly assigned t o this action. Also, RECOMMENDING that plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis 2 be denied. This action be dismissed without prejudice to re-filing upon pre payment of the $400.00 filing fee. MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS 2 referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
