Smith v. Giovannini et al
| Wayne D. Smith |
| John C. Rogers, Ricky Martino, Christopher Cattran, Scott Owens and John Giovannini |
| 2:2014cv01501 |
| June 24, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/6/2014 RECOMMENDING that the 1 Complaint be dismissed without prejudice in accordance with Local Rule 110 and F.R.Cv.P. Rule 41(b); REFERRING this matter to Senior Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; ORDERING that any objections be filed within fourteen (14) days. (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 8/18/14 GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP. The complaint is dismissed for the reasons discussed, with leave to file an amended complaint within 28 days from the date of service of this Order. The amended complaint must comply with the requirements of the FRCP and the Local Rules of Practice; the amended complaint must bear the docket number assigned this case and must be labeled "Amended Complaint;" plaintiff must file an original and two copies of the amended complaint; failure to file an amended complaint will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Meuleman, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
