Alsup v. U.S. Bancorp
| Marlene Alsup |
| U.S. Bancorp |
| 2:2014cv01515 |
| June 26, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Other Labor Litigation |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/7/16 ORDERING that initial disclosures as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) shall be completed by 1/28/2016. All discovery shall be completed by 7/11/2016. Designation of Expert Witnesses due not later than 7/18/2016, and rebuttal expert disclosures due by 8/8/2016. All dispositive motions, except motions for continuances, temporary restraining orders or other emergency applications, shall be heard no later than 10/7/2016. The Final Pretrial Conference is set for 2/10/2017 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Judge Kimberly J. Mueller, with a joint pretrial conference statement due by 1/20/2017. The Jury Trial is set for 3/20/2017 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Judge Kimberly J. Mueller, with trial briefs due by 3/6/2017. A Settlement Conference is set for 4/5/2016 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 25 (KJN) before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/18/15 ORDERING that MOTION 25 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. To the extent the amended complaint alleges disability discrimination, failure to accommodate, and failure to engage in a good-fa ith, interactive process on the basis of Plaintiff's inability to work for a particular supervisor, it is dismissed with prejudice; In all other respects, the motion is DENIED; and Defendants shall answer the amended complaint within fourteen days. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/13/2015 GRANTING defendant's 6 Amended Motion to Dismiss with leave to amend. Plaintiff shall file an Amended Complaint, if at al, no later than 21 days from date of this Order. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/15/14: Defendant's request is granted and its supplemental brief is deemed filed as of the date its proposed brief was filed. If plaintiff wishes to respond, it may file a brief of five or fewer pages no later than seven days from the issuance of this order. Thereafter the matter will be submitted. (Kaminski, H)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Alsup v. U.S. Bancorp | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Marlene Alsup | |
| Represented By: | Robert Peter Henk |
| Represented By: | Sheri Lynn Leonard |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: U.S. Bancorp | |
| Represented By: | Joan Tucker Fife |
| Represented By: | Emilie Consuelo Woodhead |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
