Vasquez v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Onessimo Vasquez |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 2:2014cv01547 |
| June 30, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Supplemental Security Income |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/1/2015 AWARDING the plaintiff SIX THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS and ZERO CENTS ($6,200.00) in attorney's fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. sec. 2412(d). (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing
24
STIPULATION and ORDER for VOLUNTARY REMAND pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/23/15 CASE CLOSED.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
22
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/2/15 ORDERING that Defendant's First Request for an Extension of time is GRANTED; The New date to file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is 3/18/2015.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
19
STIPULATION and ORDER 18 for extension of time signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/14/2015. Plaintiff's Opening Brief now due on 1/16/2015. The Court's 5 Scheduling Order is MODIFIED accordingly. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
16
STIPULATION and ORDER 15 for extension of time signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/8/2014. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment now due on 1/12/2015 and the Court's 6 Scheduling Order is modified accordingly. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/3/2014: Plaintiff's 3 Motion to Proceed IFP is GRANTED; the Clerk of the Court is directed to serve the undersigneds scheduling order in Social Security cases; the Clerk of the Court is further directed to serve a copy of this order on the United States Marshal; within fourteen days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the United States Marshal an original and five copies of the completed summons, five copies of t he complaint, and five copies of the scheduling order, and shall file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the United States Marshal; the United States Marshal is directed to service process not later than 60 days. (Owen, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Vasquez v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Onessimo Vasquez | |
| Represented By: | Kelsey Mackenzie Brown |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Bobbie J. Montoya, ss |
| Represented By: | Mark A. Win |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
