Torlucci v. Meitten et al
| Arthur Torlucci |
| Meitten, Hamkar, Bonnie Swift, - San Joaquin Hospital, Schwartz, Schmidt and Wanda Vira |
| 2:2014cv01554 |
| July 1, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 11/8/18 DENYING 17 Motion to reopen. (Coll, A)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/13/15 ORDERING that the clerk of the court randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action. U.S. District Judge Morrison C. England Jr. randomly assigned to this action. Also, RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed for failure to state a cognizable claim for relief. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Arthur Torlucci signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/26/2014. CDCR shall collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in monthly payments and forward to t he Clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDCR. The Clerk shall also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDCR, Financial)(Yin, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
