Mehmood v. Andris, et al.
| Yasir Mehmood |
| Andris, U.S. Marshal Service and United States of America |
| 2:2014cv01613 |
| July 8, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Allison Claire |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/10/2015 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 16 Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis is DENIED AS MOOT. Plaintiff is deemed to have received notice of entry of judgment that satisfies the notice requir ement of Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(6) on 1/28/2015. Plaintiff's 9 , 10 correspondence and 11 notice of appeal are construed as motions to reopen the time to file an appeal. Plaintiff's 8 motion to reopen the time to fi le an appeal was timely and is GRANTED. Plaintiff's 10 , 11 motions to reopen the time to file an appeal are DENIED as duplicative. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the Clerk of the Court for the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. (cc: USCA) (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/31/14 denying 5 Motion for emergency injunctive relief is dupliative of his motion in his pending criminal proceeding and is denied. This action is dismissed with prejudice. (Plummer, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
