Denton v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc.
Plaintiff: Timothy Denton
Defendant: G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc.
Case Number: 2:2014cv01697
Filed: July 18, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Carolyn K. Delaney
Presiding Judge: Kimberly J. Mueller
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 12/6/2016 ORDERING that the court APPROVES the Parties' Private Attorneys General Act Settlement Agreement and Limited Release. (Zignago, K.)
September 4, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/3/15 ORDERING that the Motion to Amend Scheduling Order 26 is GRANTED. All discovery, lay and expert, shall be completed by 11/6/2015; discovery after 9/7/15 may be conducted only to support allegat ions asserted for the first time in the amended complaint. Dispositive Motions shall be heard no later than 1/15/2016. The Final Pretrial Conference is RESET for 5/26/2016. The parties shall file a joint pretrial conference statement no later than 5/5/16. The Jury Trial is SET for 7/11/2016. Trial briefs are due by 6/27/16.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
August 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/20/2015 ORDERING 24 Plaintiff's motion to compel is GRANTED; Further responses to the interrogatories and production of documents shall be made within 14 days, limited to employees based out of the Sacramento branch from the time period of July 2012 to July 2015, but including employees within those parameters who have held any of the various former positions held during plaintiff's employment with defendant. (Reader, L)
July 27, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 25 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 7/24/2015 ORDERING that Defendant G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc. shall produce to Plaintiff's counsel all non-privileged documents which are responsive to the document req uests (nos. 1-27) set forth in the Notice of Deposition of Robert Schreiner (served 6/18/2015) no later than noon, Wednesday, 8/12/2015. Defendant G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc. will produce Rosemary Hill for deposition at the previously-noticed location on 8/20/2015 at 10:00 a.m., and will produce Robert Schreiner for deposition at the previously-noticed location on 8/21/2015 at 10:00 a.m. (Zignago, K.)
May 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER granting 10 Motion for leave to amend signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/7/15. (Kaminski, H)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Denton v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Timothy Denton
Represented By: Nicholas John Scardigli
Represented By: Robert Joshua Wasserman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc.
Represented By: Mark S. Askanas
Represented By: Alison H Hong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?