Gubanov v. Stanislaus County et al
Evgeniy Gubanov |
Stanislaus County and Adam Christianson |
2:2014cv01731 |
July 22, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Edmund F. Brennan |
John A. Mendez |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 52 RELATED CASE ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 7/12/16 relating this case with member case 1:16-CV-00897 LJO-EPG. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 47 ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/27/16 ORDERING that the motion for summary is GRANTED. Judgment is entered in favor of defendants and against plaintiff. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 40 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 04/07/2016 RECOMMENDING the 12/3/14 status (pretrial scheduling) order be MODIFIED and the discovery deadline EXTENDED for the limited purpose of resolving plaintiff's motion to withdraw admissions and GRANTING 32 Motion to be Relieved from Deemed Admissions. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections due within 7 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Jackson, T) |
Filing 23 ORDER granting 16 Motion to Dismiss signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 12/11/15. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 10 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 11/24/14: Application for Leave to Amend the Complaint is Granted. (Kaminski, H) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.