Choice Hotels International, Inc. v. Shri Laxmi Naryan Hospitality Group of Sacramento, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Choice Hotels International, Inc.
Defendant: Shri Laxmi Naryan Hospitality Group of Sacramento, Inc. and Watkins/Sacramento Inn, LLC
Case Number: 2:2014cv01926
Filed: August 19, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Allison Claire
Presiding Judge: John A. Mendez
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER ON SATISFACTION OF SETTLEMENT signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 2/8/19 and dismissal of claims against Shri Laxmi Naryan Hospitality Group of Sacramento, Inc. with prejudice.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
April 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 4/13/15 ORDERING that pursuant to the parties' request, the Court will maintain jurisdiction over this matter but administratively close it for statistical purposes without prejudice to it being reopened to enter judgment or order of dismissal or further proceedings if the settlement is not fully consummated. (Kastilahn, A)
April 7, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 4/6/15 ORDERING that defendant Watkins is DISMISSED from this action without prejudice; Choice Hotels and Watkins to bear their own fees and costs. (Kastilahn, A)
March 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/20/2015 ORDERING 20 Defendants, including each of their respective agents, employees, officers, and representatives, and all those in active concert or participation with them, are permanently, and forever ENJOINED from using or contributing to the use of Plaintiff's CLARION family of marks as identified in the Complaint filed herein, or any similar marks, without the consent of Choice Hotels; the Court further ORDERS Defendants to deliver to Pl aintiff any items in their possession, custody, or control bearing any of the CLARION family of marks; The Court further ORDERS Defendants to file a sworn statement of compliance as provided in 15:1116(a); Non-Appealability: this Stipulated Permanent Injunction is FINAL and may not be appealed by any party. (Reader, L)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Choice Hotels International, Inc. v. Shri Laxmi Naryan Hospitality Group of Sacramento, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shri Laxmi Naryan Hospitality Group of Sacramento, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Watkins/Sacramento Inn, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Choice Hotels International, Inc.
Represented By: Kimberly Diane Howatt
Represented By: Timothy Paul Lindell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?