Sausman v. Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Paul Sausman
Defendant: Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc., Pamela G. Marrone, Donald J. Glidewell and James B. Boyd
Case Number: 2:2014cv02072
Filed: September 8, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Kendall J. Newman
Presiding Judge: Morrison C. England
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities/Exchanges
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 78
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 2/12/2015 ORDERING that all Motions to Consolidate ( 15 , 20 , and 24 ) are GRANTED. Special Situations' Motion for Appointment as Lead Plaintiff and for Approval of Lead Counsel ( 15 ) in the above-captioned actions and all related actions consolidated under this Order is GRANTED, and the Global Investors and Marrone Investor Group motions ( 20 , 24 ) are DENIED without prejudice. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 42, the actions denomi nated as Martinelli v. Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc., No. 2:14-cv-02055-MCE-KJN, Sausman v. Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc., No. 2:14-cv-02072-MCE-KJN, Chen v. Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc., 2:14-cv-02105-MCE-KJN, Oldham v. Marrone Bio Innovations, I nc., 2:14-cv-02130-MCE-KJN, and Special Situations Fund III QP, L.P. v. Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc., No. 2:14-cv-02571-MCE-KJN are CONSOLIDATED. Case No. 2:14-cv-02571-MCE-KJN is designated as the "master file." The Clerk of the Court i s directed to add all complaints and answers filed in Case Nos. 2:14-cv-02055-MCE-KJN, 2:14-cv-02072-MCE-KJN, 2:14-cv-02105-MCE-KJN, and 2:14-cv-02130-MCE-KJN to the master case. The Clerk of the Court is directed to administratively close Case Nos. 2:14-cv-02055-MCE-KJN, 2:14-cv-02072-MCE-KJN, 2:14-cv-02105-MCE-KJN, and 2:14-cv-02130-MCE-KJN. The parties are directed to file a Joint Status Report, with all parties participating, pursuant to the Order Requiring Joint Status Report in the master case. The parties are directed to file all future pleadings, motions and other filings ONLY in case No. 2:14-cv-02571-MCE-KJN. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)
December 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 16 RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 12/1/2014 ORDERING that cases 2:14-cv-02055 MCE-KJN, 2:14-cv-02072 MCE-KJN, 2:14-cv-02105 TLN-EFB, 2:14-cv-02130 WBS-DAD, 2:14-cv-02571 KJM-EFB are RELATED and REASSIGNED to Chief J udge Morrison C. England, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman for all further proceedings. Any dates currently set in the reassigned cases only are hereby VACATED. The Clerk of the Court is to issue an Order Requiring Joint Status Report. (Zignago, K.)
October 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 12 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 10/29/14 ORDERING the Court ADOPTS the above stipulation 11 in its entirety, except that the parties are ORDERED to submit joint status reports informing the Court of the sta tus of this case every sixty (60) days starting from the date this order is electronically filed until the appointment of a lead plaintiff and lead counsel and the establishment of a date to provide the Court with the Joint Status report required by the Court's September 8, 2014, Order (ECF No. 2). (Becknal, R)
October 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 9 RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 10/7/14 ORDERING that Sausman v. Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc. et al 2:14-cv-02072-MCE-KJN and Martinelli v. Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc. et al 2:14-cv-02055-MCE-KJN ARE DESIGNATED as related actions as defined by Local Rule 123(a). However, given that both actions are already assigned to the same judges, no reassignment is necessary.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sausman v. Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Paul Sausman
Represented By: Willow Eileen Radcliffe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pamela G. Marrone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Donald J. Glidewell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James B. Boyd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?