Kinsale Insurance Company v. Sky High Sports LLC, et al.
Kinsale Insurance Company |
Sky High Sports LLC, Sky High Sports Concord LLC, Sky High Sports Nashville LLC, Sky High Sports Ontario LLC, Sky High Sports Opportunities LLC, Sky High Sports Orange County LLC, Sky High Sports Sacramento LLC, Sky High Sports Santa Clara LLC and Sky High Sports Seattle LLC |
2:2014cv02086 |
September 9, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Dale A. Drozd |
Garland E. Burrell |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 65 ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 1/22/2018 ORDERING, based on the foregoing calculations, the Clerk is directed to enter judgment in Plaintiff's favor against Defendant Sky High Sports Opportunities LLC (Opportunities) in the amount of $525,385.83 and collectively against Sky High Sports Concord LLC, Sky High Sports Sacramento LLC and Sky High Sports Santa Clara LLC (the Ownership Companies) for $924,026.32. The matter having now been concluded, the Clerk is directed to close the file. CASE CLOSED (Becknal, R) |
Filing 56 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 05/24/17 ORDERING that the 37 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: Plaintiffs Motion is GRANTED as to Defendants' liability f or breach of contract arising from the failure to pay unreimbursed deductibles and insurance premiums pursuant to the Insurance Contracts. Plaintiff's motion is DENIED, without prejudice, with regard to the determination of specific amounts owe d by each Defendant, and with regard to any prejudgment interest owed on those amounts, since the amounts owed remain unclear. The parties are ordered to schedule a prove-up hearing concerning the narrow issue of how much each Defendant is liable for in unpaid insurance premiums and deductibles under the Insurance Contracts, and the question of whether prejudgment interest should be awarded on any said amounts. (Benson, A) |
Filing 34 ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 5/12/2016 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 28 Motion to Amend the Complaint is GRANTED, except that the request made therein for a revision of the operative Pretrial Scheduling Order is DENIED as moot. Plaintiff is directed to file its Proposed First Amended and Supplemental Complaint not later than ten (10) days after the date this Order is electronically filed. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 32 PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 3/3/16 ORDERING that all discovery, with the exception of expert discovery, shall be completed by 8/15/2016. Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 10/14/2016. The last d ay to hear dispositive motions shall be 2/23/2017. A Settlement Conference is SET for 9/23/2016 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.. Each party is directed to submit to the chambers of Judge England confidential settlement conference statements not later than 9/16/2016. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 27 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 12/17/15. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 24 STIPULATION and ORDER extending time until November 30, 2015, in which to comply with the Court's Order to produce responses to the Requests signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/10/15. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 21 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on 8/25/15 ORDERING that Plaintiff prevails on the liability portion of its breach of contract claim. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 20 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/31/2015 ORDERING that plaintiff's 16 motion to compel is GRANTED. Defendants shall produce responses to plaintiffs discovery requests within sixty days of the date of this order. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 9 STIPULATED AND PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/2/14 re: 8 . (Meuleman, A) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.