Taylor v. Banner Lassen Medical Center et al
Brandon Taylor |
Roche, Kaiela and Banner Lassen Medical Center |
2:2014cv02163 |
September 17, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Lassen |
Kendall J. Newman |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/23/15 ordering this action is dismissed without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 12 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/12/14 ordering plaintiff's amended complaint is dismissed with 30 days to file a second amended complaint on the complaint form provided by the clerk of the court. The clerk of the court shall send plaintiff the form for a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/30/14 ORDERING that Plaintiff shall submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, a completed affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by th e Clerk of Court; Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner; and plaintiff shall submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, a certified copy of his prison trust account statement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint.(Dillon, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.