LeBus v. Cusick et al
| Naomi Marie LeBus |
| First Bank, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems and S.B.S Trust Network |
| Office of the U.S. Trustee (Sac) and David Cusick |
| 2:2014cv02165 |
| September 18, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Allison Claire |
| Morrison C. England |
| Withdrawal |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0157 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 10/29/14 ORDERING stay in this matter is LIFTED. Plaintiff's Motion to withdraw the reference (ECF No. 1 ) is DENIED without prejudice to filing an amended motion setting for the ratio nale for withdrawal of the reference. This matter is Remanded to the Bankruptcy Court and all further proceedings in this adversary action, if any are warranted, shall be held before that court. In addition, to the extent that Plaintiff's counse l has appeared in this action before the District Court, pursuant to the Bankruptcy Court's October 15, 2014, Order (ECF No. 69, 2:14-ap-2049), William F. Abbott, is RELIEVED as counsel for Plaintiff Naomi Marie LeBus and Plaintiff Naomi Marie LeBus is SUBSTITUTED in pro per in this matter. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to serve this Order on Plaintiff/Debtor Naomi Marie LeBus at P.O. Box 636,Douglas City, CA 96024. CASE CLOSED. (cc USBC)(Becknal, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
