Barker v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.
William Barker |
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Brian Duffy, K. Allen, W. Perehoduk and K. Anger |
2:2014cv02403 |
October 13, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Solano |
Carolyn K. Delaney |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/14/16 DISMISSING CASE pursuant to FRCP 41(a). CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 29 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 7/14/16 ordering good cause appearing, the parties stipulated request to vacate the March 9, 2016 Scheduling Order 24 ) is GRANTED.The July 18, 2016 pretrial-motion deadline is vacated. The Court will set a new deadline after November 9, 2016, if necessary. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 27 ORDER AND WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM ISSUED signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 7/5/2016 ORDERING the custodian to produce William Barker #P-86703, to testify in USDC at 9:00 A.M. on 11/9/2016 in courtroom #25, before Magis trate Judge Kendall J. Newman; custodian is ordered to notify the court of any change in custody of this inmate and is ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ. (cc: OTCD-SAC, KJN) (3 Certified copies of Order and Writ served by mail on CHCF Warden)(Yin, K) |
Filing 24 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 03/09/16 ordering the parties stipulated request to modify the 11/19/15 scheduling order 23 is granted. The parties may conduct discovery until 4/25/16. All pretrial motions, except motions to compel discovery, shall be filed on or before 7/18/16. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 6 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 08/11/15 ordering the clerk of the court shall issue and send plaintiff 5 summonses, for defendants CDCR, Duffy, Allen, Perhoduk and Anger. The clerk shall also send plaintiff 6 copies of the f orm consent to proceed before united states magistrate judge with this order. Plaintiff shall complete service of process on defendants within 60 days from the date of this order. Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this order and a copy of the form co nsent to proceed before United States Magistrate on each defendant at the time the summons and complaint are served. Defendants shall reply to the complaint within the time provided in FRCP 21(a). (6 copies of this order, 5 summons and 6 copies of the consent to proceed before magistrate judge form served on attorney for plaintiff by mail.) (Plummer, M) |
Filing 5 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/22/15 ordering that service is appropriate for the following defendants: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Brian Duffy, K. Allen, W. Perehoduk and K. Anger. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/5/14 ORDERING that Plaintiffs § 1983 claims against defendants Duffy and Allen are dismissed with leave to amend; If plaintiff elects to amend, any amended complaint must bear the do cket number assigned this case and must be labeled Amended Complaint; If plaintiff elects to amend, the Amended Complaint shall be filed no more than thirty days from the date of this order; and upon the filing of an amended complaint or expiration of the time allowed therefor, the court will make further orders for service of process upon some or all of the defendants.(Dillon, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.