Plascencia v. People of the State of California
Petitioner: Jose Plascencia
Respondent: People of the State of California
Case Number: 2:2014cv02412
Filed: October 14, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Kings
Presiding Judge: Kendall J. Newman
Presiding Judge: William B. Shubb
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 34 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 08/10/18 RECOMMENDING that petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus be denied. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
September 26, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/25/2017 ORDERING Clerk of Court to append pages 5-15 of 1 Petition to the end of 18 Second Amended Petition beginning as a new page 30, prior to the exhibits, and ORDERING within 30 days from the date of this order, respondent to file either: a.) an amended answer, or b.) a notice that respondent stands on the previously-filed answer. (Henshaw, R)
June 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/24/2015 GRANTING 16 Petitioner's motion to lift the Stay; the Clerk of the Court is directed to REOPEN the case; and Respondent is directed to file a responsive pleading, as instructed in 8 the Order dated 12/29/2014, within 60 days from the date of this order. (Reader, L)
February 27, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/27/15 ORDERING that Petitioners motion to stay 11 is granted pursuant to Kelly v. Small, 315 F.3d 1063, 1071 (9th Cir. 2002); Within 30 days from the date of any order by the California Su preme Court addressing petitioners habeas petition, petitioner shall file a motion to lift the stay of this action; Petitioners request 14 is denied without prejudice; and the Clerk of the Court is directed to administratively close this case.(Dillon, M)
November 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER denying 6 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/13/14. (Plummer, M)
October 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/28/14 ORDERING that Petitioner shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee; Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district.(Dillon, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Plascencia v. People of the State of California
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jose Plascencia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: People of the State of California
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?