Batista v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Joao Batista
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 2:2014cv02441
Filed: October 17, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: San Joaquin
Presiding Judge: Allison Claire
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 23, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER GRANTING 22 Motion for Attorney Fees, signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/22/17. Counsel for plaintiff is awarded $18,584.00 in attorney's fees under § 406(b); the Commissioner shall certify that amount to be paid to counsel from the funds previously withheld for the payment of such fees. Counsel for plaintiff is directed to remit to plaintiff the amount of $6,489.12 for EAJA fees previously paid to counsel by the Commissioner. (Kastilahn, A)
December 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 21 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/19/16 ORDERING that plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees in the amount of $6,489.12. (Benson, A)
September 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 9/15/2016 GRANTING Plaintiff's 15 Motion for Summary Judgment and DENYING Commissioner's 16] Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. This matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner for the immediate calculation and payment of benefits for an onset date of 12/31/2010. CASE CLOSED. (Jackson, T)
October 26, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 14 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/26/15: Plaintiff's time to file her summary judgment motion is hereby extended from October 23, 2015, to November 6, 2015. (Kaminski, H)
May 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 5/14/2015 GRANTING 2 Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis; the Clerk of the Court is directed to serve the undersigned's scheduling order in social security cases; the Clerk o f the Court is further directed to serve a copy of this order on the United States Marshal; within 14 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the USM a completed summons and copies of the complaint and file a statement with the co urt that said documents have been submitted to the USM; Information regarding the number of copies currently required by the USM may be obtained from the USMS, Sacramento, CA; the USM is directed to serve all process without prepayment of costs not later than 60 days from the date of this order. (Reader, L)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Batista v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joao Batista
Represented By: Bess M. Brewer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?