Woods v. Roddrick, et al.
| Tajhikeem Woods |
| Roddrick, A. Arnold and G. Hale |
| 2:2014cv02458 |
| October 20, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Lassen |
| Allison Claire |
| Morrison C. England |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/24/16 ordering on October 20, 2016, plaintiff filed a motion for appointment of counsel. This civil rights action was closed on September 13, 2016. Plaintiff is advised that documents filed by plaintiff since the closing date will be disregarded and no orders will issue in response to future filings. (Plummer, M) Modified on 10/25/2016 (Plummer, M).
|
|
Filing
39
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/28/2016 RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted due to plaintiff's failure to exhaust admi nistrative remedies before commencing this action, see 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1); 42 U.S.C. § 1997e (c)(2); and plaintiff's 27 , 31 , 35 requests for extraordinary relief be denied as moot. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 10/9/2015 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 28 are ADOPTED in FULL; The judgment entered in this action 25 (and therefore the Findings and Recommendations 20 ) are VACATED; and this action is REOPENED for further consideration of Plaintiff's First AmendedComplaint 15 and the merits of this action, including Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order. 27 (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 9/18/15 ORDERING that the Office of the California Attorney General is directed to contact CHCF authorities forthwith, to determine the present status of plaintiffs safe ty and mental and physical treatmentneeds. Because no defendant has been served process in this case, the Clerk of Court is directed to fax a copy of this order to the Office of the California Attorney General, Attention: Supervising Deputy Attorney General Monica Anderson. Ms. Anderson or her designee is directed to file a status report with the court within 14 days after the filing date of this order, and to serve a copy of the report on plaintiff. In addition, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that t he judgment entered in this action August 20, 2015, ECF No. 25 (and therefore the Findings and Recommendations filed June 12, 2015, ECF No. 20 ), be vacated for purposes of further consideration of plaintiffs First AmendedComplaint (ECF No. 15 ). Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (cc Monica Anderson)(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
20
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 06/11/15 recommending that plaintiff's request for extraordinary relief 14 , [16-7], be denied as moot; and this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim due to its commencement before plaintiff exhausted his available administrative remedies. Motions 14 , 16 referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
