Sandhu v. Chappell
Petitioner: Harwinder Singh Sandhu
Respondent: Kevin Chappell
Case Number: 2:2014cv02459
Filed: October 20, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Marin
Presiding Judge: Kendall J. Newman
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 04/23/15 ordering a certificate of appealability does not issue. The clerk of the court is directed to process petitioner's appeal. (Plummer, M)
January 12, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/12/15 ORDERING that 2 Motion to Proceed IFP is GRANTED; this action is DISMISSED. CASE CLOSED. (Dillon, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sandhu v. Chappell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Harwinder Singh Sandhu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Kevin Chappell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?