Robertson v. Harvey
| Conie R. Robertson |
| Ryan S. Harvey and United States of America |
| 2:2014cv02888 |
| December 11, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Craig M. Kellison |
| Troy L. Nunley |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 9/17/2015 RECOMMENDING that Defendant's 7 motion to dismiss be granted. Plaintiff's complaint be dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court be directed to enter judgment and close this case. Motion referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections to F&R due within 20 days. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 4/6/2015 ORDERING that the scheduling conference set for 4/22/2015, is VACATED, to be reset following final resolution of the pending motion to dismiss, if appropriate. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 2/26/2015 VACATING the 3/4/2015 hearing for 7 Motion to Dismiss. The matter is SUBMITTED on the record and briefs without oral argument. (Donati, J)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 12/17/2014 GRANTING government's 5 Ex Parte Application for Extension of Time. The United States' deadline is EXTENDED to 1/16/2015. (Marciel, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
