United States of America v. Approximately $9,000.00 in U.S. Currency
| United States of America |
| Approximately $9,000.00 in U.S. Currency |
| 2:2014mc00026 |
| February 14, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Troy L. Nunley |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property |
| Civil Miscellaneous Case |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
CONSENT JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/28/2014 ORDERED AND ADJUDGED The Court ADOPTS the Stipulation for Consent Judgment of Forfeiture entered into by and between the parties. Upon entry of this Consent Judgment of Forfeiture, $4,000.00 of the Approximately $9,000.00 in US Currency, together with any interest that may have accrued on the entire amount seized, shall be forfeited to the US pursuant to 21:881(a)(6), to be disposed of according to law . Upon entry of this Consent Judgment of Forfeiture, but no later than 60 days thereafter, $5,000.00 of the Approximately $9,000.00 in US Currency shall be returned to potential claimant Jim McCullough. Pursuant to the Stipulation for Cons ent Judgment of Forfeiture filed herein, the Court finds that there was reasonable cause for the seizure of the defendant currency and a Certificate of Reasonable Cause pursuant to 28:2465 shall be entered accordingly. No portion of the stipulated se ttlement, including statements or admissions made therein, shall be admissible in any criminal action pursuant to Rules 408 and 410(a)(4) of the Federal Rules of Evidence. All parties will bear their own costs and attorneys' fees. Pursuant to the Stipulation for Consent Judgment of Forfeiture filed herein, the Court ENTERS a CERTIFICATE OF REASONABLE CAUSE pursuant to 28:2465, that there was reasonable cause for the seizure of the described defendant currency. CASE CLOSED(Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
4
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/14/14 EXTENDING time to file a complaint for forfeiture and/or to obtain an indictment alleging forfeiture to 4/21/14. (Manzer, C)
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/19/14: The deadline by which the United States shall be required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant currency is subject to forfeiture shall be extended to March 21, 2014. (Kaminski, H)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: United States of America v. Approximately $9,000.00 in U.S. Currency | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Kevin Christopher Khasigian |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Approximately $9,000.00 in U.S. Currency | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
