United States of America v. Approximately $14,600.00 in U.S. Currency et al
Plaintiff: |
United States of America |
Defendant: |
Approximately $14,600.00 in U.S. Currency and Approximately $5,900.00 in U.S. Currency |
Case Number: |
2:2014mc00048 |
Filed: |
April 8, 2014 |
Court: |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Office: |
Sacramento Office |
County: |
Sacramento |
Presiding Judge: |
Allison Claire |
Presiding Judge: |
Lawrence K. Karlton |
Nature of Suit: |
Drug Related Seizure of Property |
Cause of Action: |
Civil Miscellaneous Case |
Jury Demanded By: |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
December 2, 2015 |
Filing
17
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/1/15: The deadline by which the United States shall be required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant currency is subject to forfeiture shall be extended to January 1, 2016. (Kaminski, H)
|
September 4, 2015 |
Filing
15
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/3/15 ORDERING that the deadline by which the United States shall be required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant currency is subject to forfeiture shall be extended to 12/2/2015.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
June 3, 2015 |
Filing
13
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 6/2/15 ORDERING that the deadline by which the United States shall be required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment is extended to 9/3/15. (Manzer, C)
|
March 12, 2015 |
Filing
11
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/11/2015 ORDERING that the deadline by which the United States shall be required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant currency is subject to forfeiture is EXTENDED to 6/5/2015. (Zignago, K.)
|
December 3, 2014 |
Filing
9
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/2/2014 ORDERING that the deadline by which the United States shall be required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant currency is subject to forfeiture is EXTENDED to 3/5/2015. (Zignago, K.)
|
October 3, 2014 |
Filing
7
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 10/2/14: The deadline by which the United States shall be required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant currency is subject to forfeiture shall be extended to December 5, 2014.(Kaminski, H)
|
July 3, 2014 |
Filing
4
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 7/3/14 ORDERING that the deadline by which the United States shall be required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant currency is subject to forfeiture shall be EXTENDED to 10/6/2014. (Becknal, R)
|
April 9, 2014 |
Filing
2
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 4/9/2014 ORDERING that the deadline by which the United States shall be required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant currency is subject to forfeiture shall be EXTENDED to 7/8/2014. (Zignago, K.)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?