Brown v. Hagel et al
| Keith Edward Brown |
| Chuck Hagel, Carl Eskew and Troy Covington |
| 2:2015cv00026 |
| January 6, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| San Joaquin |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| John A. Mendez |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
ORDER DISMISSING ALL CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 5/17/2018. CASE CLOSED. (Hunt, G)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/11/18, ORDERING that all pending deadlines in this matter are STAYED while the parties prepare a formal settlement agreement and dispositional documents. The parties shall file a status report on or before 7/9/2018, if dispositional documents have not been filed by that date. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/20/18, ORDERING that Defendants' motion to compel a response to Interrogatory Number 8 is GRANTED; Plaintiff to respond by 3/23/2018. Defendants' motion to compel Plaintiff to prod uce documents responsive to Document Request Numbers 10, 16, 18, 20, and 21 is GRANTED; Plaintiff to produce documents to defendants' counsel by 3/23/2018 at 12:00 p.m. Defendants' motion to compel Plaintiff to produce documents identified on Plaintiff's Additional Listing of Documentary Material (ECF [63-3]) and Plaintiff's Additional Listing of DocumentaryMaterial/Set Two (ECF [63-4]) is GRANTED; Plaintiff to produce documents to defendants' counsel by 3/23/2018 at 12:00 p.m. Defendants' motion for a protective order is GRANTED. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER and ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 05/31/17 ORDERING that the status (pretrial scheduling) conference is CONTINUED to 6/7/2017 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan; pla intiff shall appear at the 06/07/17 hearing to SHOW CAUSE why sanctions should not be imposed for his failure to appear at the 05/31/17 hearing. Failure to comply with this order may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (Benson, A)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 3/29/2017; ADOPTING 43 Findings and Recommendations; GRANTING 22 Motion to Dismiss as follows: Plaintiff's Title VII and ADEA claims are dismissed without leave to amend to the extent they are predicated on agency action that occurred after 6/11/2013. The balance of plaintiff's age discrimination claim is dismissed with leave to amend. Plaintiff's defamation claim and due process claims (and related harmful procedural error claim) are dismissed without leave to amend. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order to file an amended complaint as provided herein. (Washington, S)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/16/17 ORDERING that Defendants' MOTION for leave to file a supplement to the MOTION to Dismiss 40 is DENIED as moot; and Plaintiff's MOTION for Sanc tions 25 is DENIED. Further, it is RECOMMENDED that defendants' MOTION to Dismiss 22 be granted. These Findings and Recommendations are submitted to U.S. District Judge John A. Mendez. Objections to these F&Rs due within fourteen days. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
39
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/15/16 ORDERING the Initial Scheduling Conference CONTINUED to 3/1/2017 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. The joint status report shall be due fourteen days prior to the status conference. (Washington, S)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/2/2016 DENYING 8 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 03/24/16 ORDERING that the 2 Motion to Proceed IFP is GRANTED; Clerk to send plaintiff 1 USM form, 1 summons, copy of complaint, scheduling order and the forms providing notice of the magistr ate judges availability to exercise jurisdiction for all purposes; within 14 days, plaintiff shall submit service documents to the USM and file a statement to the court regarding the submission; USM shall serve process within 90 days and within 14 days thereafter file a statement that said documents have been served. (Benson, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
