Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Company v. Centex Homes
| Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Company |
| Centex Homes |
| 2:2015cv00037 |
| January 6, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Troy L. Nunley |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
ORDER ON STIPULATION TO CONTINUE ALL SCHEDULED DATES BY 90 DAYS, signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/4/15. Initial Expert Witness Disclosures due 6/1/2016. Supplemental Expert Witness Disclosures due 7/21/2016. Discovery Cut-off is 4/4 /2016. Dispositive Motion Hearing Date is 10/20/2016. The Final Pretrial Conference is CONTINUED to 1/12/2017 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. The Jury Trial is CONTINUED to 3/20/2017 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/4/15 ORDERING that in light of continuing informal dispute resolution proceedings in the underlying Brown construction defects litigation pending in state court, as well as the parties forthco ming stipulation proposing an extension of the discovery completion deadline, the court GRANTS S&Rs motion to quash the subpoena. However, the motion is granted without prejudice to Centexs ability to renew its request to depose S&R (and propound doc ument requests on S&R) in the future, if the posture of the underlying Brown action changes or Centex otherwise deems it reasonably necessary. The court expresses no opinion at this juncture with respect to whether such a deposition and document requ ests would be permitted. In light of the forthcoming stipulation and proposed order to extend the discovery completion deadline, the parties shall promptly meet and confer, and advise the court as to which currently pending discovery motions should b e withdrawn without prejudice, to be re-noticed at a later date, if necessary. The parties are reminded that they also have the option of requesting informal telephonic discovery conferences in lieu of re-noticing formal motions, and are encouraged to do so.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER granting Dillon's 27 Motion to Quash, signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/13/15. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
26
PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 7/21/15: Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 3/3/2016. Discovery due by 1/4/2016. Dispositive Motions filed by 7/14/2016. Final Pretrial Conference set for 10/6/2016 at 02 :00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. Jury Trial set for 12/12/2016 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. Settlement Conference set for 3/24/2016 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 26 (AC) before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
14
STIPULATION and ORDER 10 for extension of time signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/4/2015. Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company's deadline to file an Amended Complaint will be 3/20/2015. (Marciel, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Company v. Centex Homes | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Abel Eric Aguilera |
| Represented By: | Raymond E. Brown |
| Represented By: | Jason Y Chao |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Centex Homes | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
