Gibbs v. Peterson, et al
| Kenneth Gibbs |
| MacComber, Roth, Baker, Reames, McCloud, Lopez, Jr., Johntson, Lopez, Schiller, Goodrich, Young, Prasinos, McAuiffe, Randy, Karla Peterson and M. Bobbala |
| 2:2015cv00061 |
| January 9, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Carolyn K. Delaney |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
89
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 08/28/18 RECOMMENDING that defendants' motion for summary judgment 82 be granted. Defendants' amended motion for sanctions 79 be denied as moot. Defendants& #039; request for judicial notice 82 -13 be denied as unnecessary. Plaintiff's request for leave to amend the complaint to identify the proper defendant as J. Johnston 87 at 52 be denied as moot. This case be closed without prejudice. Motions 79 , 82 , and 87 referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections to within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/6/2017 DENYING plaintiff's 75 motion to compel and GRANTING plaintiff's 76 motion for extension of time to supplement his interrogatory responses. Plaintiff is required to fu lly respond to Interrogatory Numbers 12 and 14 of Defendant Prasinos's First Set of Interrogatories and Interrogatory Numbers 7 and 8 of Defendant Johnson's First Set of Interrogatories by November 20, 2017. Plaintiff shall also serve a verified copy of his original and supplemental interrogatory responses on defendants by 11/20/2017. The deadline to file any additional motions to compel discovery is extended to 12/7/2017 for good cause shown. The deadline to file a dispositive motion is extended to 1/3/2018 for good cause shown. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/20/2017 ORDERING the documents submitted for in camera review are not required to be disclosed to plaintiff.(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/10/2017 ORDERING plaintiff's 63 motion to compel, construed as a request for injunctive relief, is DENIED. Plaintiff's 66 second motion to compel is GRANTED in part and DENIE D in part. The motion is granted only to the extent that defendants are required to produce the assertedly privileged RVRs and medical reports for in camera review within 7 days of this order to ckdorders@caed.uscourts.gov. Defendants' 65 motion to compel is GRANTED. Plaintiff is required to fully respond to Interrogatory Numbers 12 and 14 of Defendant Prasinos's First Set of Interrogatories and Interrogatory Numbers 7 and 8 of Defendant Johnson's First Set of Interr ogatories by 11/1/2017. Plaintiff shall also serve a verified copy of his original and supplemental interrogatory responses on defendants by 11/1/2017. The court sua sponte extends the deadline to file any additional motions to compel discovery to 11/16/2017. (Yin, K) Modified on 10/10/2017 (Yin, K).
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/11/2017 ORDERING that the 48 findings and recommendations are ADOPTED in full. All defendants other than defendants Johnson and Prasinos are DISMISSED. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/27/2017 DENYING 54 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 03/01/17 ORDERING that defendant Johnson file his response to plaintiff's amended complaint within 14 days. Also, RECOMMENDING that all defendants other than defendant Johnson and Prasinos be dismissed. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/17/17 ordering that plaintiff is granted 30 days within which to file a second amended complaint. If plaintiff elects not to file a second amended complaint within 30 days the court will direct defendant Johnson to file a response to plaintiff's amended complaint and recommend that all other defendants be dismissed. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/8/16 NOT ADOPTING 24 Findings and Recommendations and REFERRING this matter back to the assigned magistrate judge for further proceedings. (Washington, S)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 08/31/15 ORDERING Service is appropriate for defendants Johnson and Prasinos. The clerk of the court shall send plaintiff 1 summons, 2 USM-285 forms, instruction sheet and a copy of the 4/17/15 second amended complaint to be completed and returned within 30 days. Also, RECOMMENDING that all defendants other than defendants Johnson and Prasinos be dismissed. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 3/12/15 ORDERING the Director of the CDC to collect and forward payment from the trust account of Kenneth Gibbs and forward payment to the court until the balance i s paid in full. Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order and a copy of plaintiff's signed in forma pauperis affidavit to the Director of the CDC; and the Clerk of the Court is further directed to serve a copy of this order on the Financial Department of the court. (cc CDC, Financial)(Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
