Bailey v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Alisha Bailey
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 2:2015cv00153
Filed: January 20, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Shasta
Presiding Judge: Craig M. Kellison
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 8/31/2021 GRANTING 21 Motion for Attorney Fees. Counsel is awarded fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406 (b) in the amount of $7,999.00, paid to counsel by the Commissioner of Social Securit y out of past-due benefits awarded to Plaintiff and withheld on 3/17/2020, to the extent such benefits have not already been paid to Plaintiff. Counsel shall reimburse to Plaintiff $2,900.00 previously paid to counsel under the EAJA. (Zignago, K.)
May 11, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 20 STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 5/11/2016 AWARDING Plaintiff Alisha Bailey attorney fees in the amount of TWO THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($2,900.00) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). (Michel, G.)
March 14, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MEMORANDUM, OPINION, and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 3/11/2016. Plaintiff's 11 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and defendant's 12 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. This matter is REMANDED for further proceedings consisten with Order. Clerk directed to enter Judgment and CLOSE this file. (Marciel, M)
February 12, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 2/12/16 ORDERING that the Order to Show Cause issued on 1/20/16 14 is DISCHARGED.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
January 20, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 1/20/16. Plaintiff is directed to show cause in writing within 30 days of the date of this order why the action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to serve on Plaintiff a copy of the Court's form entitled Consent to Assignment or Request for Reassignment.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
January 28, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 1/28/2015 GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to issue all necessary process. Within 15 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit all documents necessary to effectuate service to the USM.(Donati, J)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bailey v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alisha Bailey
Represented By: Young Chul Cho
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Bobbie J. Montoya, ss
Represented By: Theophous H. Reagans
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?