Germany v. California Department of Corrections, et al.
Alfred Germany |
California Department of Corrections and Mike Davis |
2:2015cv00190 |
January 23, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Lassen |
Craig M. Kellison |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 12/28/17 ORDERING this action is dismissed for failure to state a claim. The clerk of the court is directed to close this case. CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 11 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 12/14/16 ORDERING that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 9 ) is GRANTED; and plaintiff shall show cause in writing, within 30 days of the date of this order, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim. (Dillon, M) |
Filing 7 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 6/22/15 ORDERING that Plaintiff shall submit on the form provided by the Clerk of the Court, within 30 days from the date of this order, a complete application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, with the required certified copy of his trust account statement, or the appropriate filing fee; and the Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new form Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner. (Dillon, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.