Supanich et al v. Ned
| Robert Supanich and Sophie Supanich |
| Yvonne Ned |
| 2:2015cv00202 |
| January 26, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| John A. Mendez |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Rent, Lease, and Ejectment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
4
ORDER ADOPTING 3 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/5/2015. This action is REMANDED to Sacramento County Superior Court. Clerk shall serve a certified copy of Order on Clerk of Sacramento County Superior Court and reference their case number (# 14UD09746). Clerk shall VACATE all dates and CLOSE this case. [cc: Sacramento Superior Court] (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER and FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/27/2015 GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP; RECOMMENDING that this action be remanded to Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento; RECOMMENDING that th e Clerk of Court be directed to serve a certified copy of the order on the Clerk of Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento referencing case no. 14UD09746; RECOMMENDING that the Clerk of Court be directed to vacate all dates and close this case; REFERRING this matter to Judge John A. Mendez; ORDERING that any objections be filed within fourteen (14) days. (Michel, G.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
