Speight v. Davey
Kristopher Deshawn Speight |
Dave Davey |
2:2015cv00209 |
January 26, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Kings |
Dale A. Drozd |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 48 MEMORANDUM DECISION signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 6/16/2021 DENYING the Petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the Court issues a Certificate of Appealability solely with respect t o Speight's CALCRIM No 301 claim (Ground 1) as well as his claim that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to that instruction (Ground 7a). See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Banks v. Dretke, 540 U.S. 668, 705 (2004) (To obtain a certificate of appealability, a prisoner must `demonstrat[e] that jurists of reason could disagree with the district court' resolution of his constitutional claims or that jurists could conclude the issues presented are adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further. The Clerk of the Court is to enter judgment accordingly. CASE CLOSED.(Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 44 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 2/27/2019 DENYING without prejudice 43 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Henshaw, R) |
Filing 41 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/29/2017 DENYING 31 Petitioner's Motion for Certificate of Appealability. (Reader, L) |
Filing 36 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 6/28/2017 GRANTING 35 Motion for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading. Responsive pleading to be filed by 8/2/2017. (Henshaw, R) |
Filing 33 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 6/2/17 ORDERING that respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 30 days from the date of this order. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 27 ORDER adopting 23 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and granting in part and denying in part 16 Motion to Dismiss signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/27/17. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 23 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 1/06/17 recommending that respondent's motion to dismiss 16 be granted in part and denied in part as follows: Respondent's motion to dismiss the petition based on lack of jurisdiction be denied; Respondent's motion to dismiss petitioner's claims regarding his 2010 sentence be granted and the court dismiss the allegations in claim 7 that petitioner's trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the 25 year to life sentence on the grounds that it violates the 8th amendment. MOTION to DISMISS 16 referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Speight v. Davey | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Kristopher Deshawn Speight | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Dave Davey | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.