Rodriguez v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Deborah Anna Rodriguez
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 2:2015cv00231
Filed: January 27, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Carolyn K. Delaney
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 21, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/21/16 denying 14 Motion for Summary Judgment and granting 21 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. Judgment is entered for the Commissioner. (Kaminski, H)
November 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/30/2015 ORDERING 22 the requested extension of plaintiff's time to file a motion for summary judgment brief is EXTENDED to 12/11/2015. (Reader, L)
October 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 20 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/19/15 ORDERING that Defendant shall respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment on or before 10/30/15. It is further ordered that any reply thereto shall be filed on or before 11/19/2015. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
September 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 17 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 9/14/15 ORDERING that Defendant shall have an extension of time of an additional 30 days to respond to Plaintiff's opening brief. The current due date is September 16, 2015. The new due date will be October 16, 2015. (Becknal, R)
July 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 7/29/2015 ORDERING 12 the requested extension of plaintiff's time to file a motion for summary judgment is EXTENDED to 8/17/2015. (Reader, L)
January 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting plaintiff's 3 Motion to Proceed IFP, signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/29/15. The Clerk is directed to serve the undersigned's scheduling order in social security cases. The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order on the United States Marshal (USM). Within 14 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the USM a completed summons and copies of the complaint and to file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the USM. The USM is directed to serve all process without prepayment of costs not later than 60 days from the date of this order. (cc: USM) (Kastilahn, A)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rodriguez v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Deborah Anna Rodriguez
Represented By: Jesse S. Kaplan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Chantal Jenkins
Represented By: Bobbie J. Montoya, ss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?