Gatlin v. McDonald et al
| Natisha Gatlin |
| Robert McDonald and Steven Milton |
| 2:2015cv00377 |
| February 16, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Carolyn K. Delaney |
| John A. Mendez |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/28/16 ORDERING that all dates in this matter are VACATED; this action is DISMISSED in its entirety and with prejudice as to all defendants; each side shall bear its own fees and costs; and Judgment shall be entered for defendants. CASE CLOSED (Benson, A)
|
|
Filing
8
STATUS (Pre-trial Scheduling) ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 7/16/15 ORDERING that the all dispositive motions shall be filed by 1/11/2017, and the hearing on such motions shall be on 2/8/2017 at 9:30 a.m.. All discovery shall be complete d by 11/30/2016. Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 10/3/2016, and Supplemental disclosure and disclosure of any rebuttal experts due by 11/1/2016. The Final Pretrial Conference is SET for 3/24/2017 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez. Jury Trial is SET for 5/1/2017 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez. The parties estimate a trial length of approximately 8 days. (Kastilahn, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
