Cramer v. City of Auburn et al
| David Cramer |
| City of Auburn, Julie Beland, Michael Bailey, Jamie Scanel and Robert Corbett |
| 2:2015cv00462 |
| March 2, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Allison Claire |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 03/07/16 ORDERING that the 32 Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED; the 02/04/16 30 Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations shall not be disturbed. (Benson, A)
|
|
Filing
23
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/19/15 RECOMMENDING that Defendants' Motion To Dismiss 12 should be GRANTED, as follows: a. Counts One and Three should be dismissed without prejudice as barred by H eck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994); and b. The court should decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Counts Two, Four and Five, and should therefore dismiss those claims without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3); and Plaintiff's Motion To Continue 16 should be DENIED. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/13/15 ORDERING that 14 the Order To Show Cause is DISCHARGED. Defendant's 12 Motion To Dismiss shall be heard on 11/18/2015 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 26 (AC) before Magistrate Judge All ison Claire. Plaintiff's 16 Motion To Continue will be considered at the above hearing on defendant's Motion To Dismiss. If defendant wishes to file a response, it shall do so no later than 11/4/2015 at 4:30 p.m.. Plaintiff's 17 Motion To Amend is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiff is instructed to refrain from filing any further motion to amend until defendant's Motion To Dismiss has been resolved. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/1/15: Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing, no later than 10/7/15, at 4:30 p.m., why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution; and the hearing currently scheduled for 10/7/15 is VACATED. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/28/2015 ORDERING 8 the motion to amend is GRANTED; the operative complaint is ECF No. 8-1; the motions for an extension of time 7 , 9 are GRANTED; plaintiff shall complete service of process no later than 30 days from the date of this order; Initial Scheduling Conference scheduled for 10/7/2015 is CONTINUED to 11/4/2015 at 10:10 AM in Courtroom 26 (AC) before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 3/20/2015 DENYING plaintiff's 2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Within 20 days from date of this Order, plaintiff shall submit appropriate filing fee. (Marciel, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
