Tatum v. Beard et al
| Richard Eugene Tatum |
| Jeffery A. Beard, Brian Duffy, E. Fareid, California Health Care Facility, H. Iserman and S. Lee |
| 2:2015cv00551 |
| March 11, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/6/2017 DISMISSING this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED.(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/27/2017 DISMISSING 15 first amended complaint with leave to amend within 30 days and DENYING 20 Motion to Compel as moot. (Henshaw, R) Modified on 4/28/2017 (Donati, J).
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/8/15 ORDERING the Director of the CDC to collect and forward payment from the trust account of Richard Eugene Tatum and forward payment to the court until the balanc e is paid in full. Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order and a copy of plaintiff's signed in forma pauperis affidavit to the Director of the CDC; and the Clerk of the Court is further directed to serve a copy of this order on the Financial Department of the court. (cc CDC, Financial). (Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
