Reyes v. Radcliff
| Victoria L Reyes |
| Radcliff |
| 2:2015cv00556 |
| March 12, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, recommending that action be dismissed with pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b); Clerk be directed to vacate all dates; and close this case, signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/29/2015. These Findings and Recommendation are SUBMITTED to District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.. Within 14 days after being served with these F/Rs, any party may file written Objections with Court and serve a copy on all parties. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER AND ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/24/15: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 1). Within 28 days of this order, plaintiff SHALL PAY to the Clerk of Court $100.00 in monetary sanctions based on plaintiff's failure to comply with the court's order and failure to prosecute her case. 2. Within 28 days of this order, plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE in writing why this action should not be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for p laintiff's failure to comply with the court's order and failure to prosecute her case. 3. Within 28 days of this order, plaintiff SHALL FILE a first amended complaint that complies with the court's 3 Order. 4. Failure to timely com ply with this order will result in a recommendation that the action be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). 5. Alternatively, if plaintiff concludes that she no longer wishes to pursue the action at this time, she may instead file a notice of voluntary dismissal of the action without prejudice in lieu of paying the sanctions, responding to the order to show cause, and filing a first amended complaint, as outlined above. 6. The Clerk of Court shall serve another copy of the 3 order on plaintiff along with this order. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/23/2015 GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP; DISMISSING CASE WITH LEAVE TO AMEND; ORDERING the plaintiff to file within 28 days, either (a) a first amended complaint in accordance with the requir ements of this order, or (b) a notice of voluntary dismissal of the action without prejudice; CAUTIONING the plaintiff that a failure to file either a first amended complaint or a notice of voluntary dismissal by the required deadline may result in the imposition of sanctions, including potential dismissal of the action with prejudice pursuant to F.R.Cv.P. Rule 41(b). (Michel, G.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Reyes v. Radcliff | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Victoria L Reyes | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Radcliff | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
