Thaut et al v. Hsieh, et al
| Kathryn Thaut, Mary Pauline Edwards, Kirk Edwards, Sherilyn Edwards and David Edwards |
| K. Hsieh, Samuel McAlpine, Jack McCue, G. Jude Shadday, John Lipson, Gary Swarthout, Priyasheelta Nand, Ramesh Dharawat, Michael Bunuan, County of San Joaquin and Northbay Healthcare |
| 2:2015cv00590 |
| March 17, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| John A. Mendez |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
63
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/27/16 RECOMMENDING that Defendants' motions to dismiss (ECF Nos. 45 , 46 , 48 , 49 ) be granted; All defendants remaining in this action be dismissed with prejudice; and The Clerk of Court be directed to close this case and vacate all dates. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 11/20/2015 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 32 are ADOPTED; Defendants' 17 , 18 Motions to Dismiss are GRANTED without leave to amend, with respect to plaintiffs' claims against Gary Swarthout, County of San Joaquin and Priyasheelta Nand, and these defendants are DISMISSED from this action with prejudice. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/28/15: 40 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as moot. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER and FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/24/2015 RECOMMENDING that the 17 , 18 Motions to Dismiss be granted without leave to amend with respect to the plaintiffs' claims against defendants Gary Swarthout, Priyasheelta Nand, and County of San Joaquin and that said defendants be dismissed from this action with prejudice; GRANTING 17 , 18 Motions to Dismiss with leave to amend with regards to the plaintiffs' claims against defendants K. Hsieh, Samuel McAlpine, Jack McCue, G. Jude Shadday, John Lipson, and Ramesh Dharawat; ORDERING the plaintiff to file a First Amended Complaint within 60 days, against defendants K. Hsieh, Samuel McAlpine, Jack McCue, G. Jude Shadday, John Lipson, Ramesh Dharawat, Michael Bunuan, and Northbay Healthcare only; ORDERING said defendants to file responses to the First Amended Complaint within 30 days of the date the plaintiffs file their amended pleading; VACATING the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference set for 8/6/2015; REFERRING this matter to Judge John A. Mendez; ORDERING that any objections be filed within fourteen (14) days. (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/6/2015 ORDERING that Plaintiffs' 27 request to submit defendants' motions to dismiss on the briefing is DENIED. Plaintiffs' 27 request to appear telephonically at the hearin g on defendants' motions to dismiss set for 7/16/2015, at 10:00 a.m. is GRANTED. Plaintiffs are informed that each of them shall call the undersigned's courtroom deputy at (916) 930-4187 by no later than 10:00 a.m. on 7/16/2015, in order to make their appearances and begin the hearing. Plaintiffs' request to appear telephonically at the initial scheduling conference set for 8/6/2015, at 10:00 a.m., is DENIED without prejudice to later renewal. (Zignago, K.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
