Berrera v. Sivyer et al
Plaintiff: Ernesto Berrera
Defendant: J. Sivyer and J. Macomber
Case Number: 2:2015cv00610
Filed: March 18, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge: Kimberly J. Mueller
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 77 ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/11/2020 DENYING 76 The Requested bill of costs entirely. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
December 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 71 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/4/2018 GRANTING 70 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this order is served to file his objections to 69 Findings and Recommendations. (Huang, H)
November 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 69 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/8/2018 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days after being serviced with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
October 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 68 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/02/18 ORDERING that within 21 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file either an opposition to the motion or a statement of no opposition. (Plummer, M)
June 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER AFTER HEARING signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/15/2018 ORDERING plaintiff's counsels' 55 motion to withdraw is GRANTED; the Clerk shall terminated Ashley R. Amerio as counsel of record for plaintiff Ernesto Berrera; and defendants' 60 motion for an order to show cause why a contempt citation should not issue to Rodrigo Sandoval is DENIED without prejudice. (Yin, K)
April 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/26/2018 GRANTING 51 Stipulation to Modify the Discovery and Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 6/4/2018. Dispositive motions to be filed by 8/3/2018. (Henshaw, R)
March 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 50 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 03/02/18 ORDERING ( Discovery due by 5/2/2018, Dispositive Motions filed by 7/2/2018.) The parties may conduct depositions of any incarcerated witnesses via video conference, where feasible. (Plummer, M)
September 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/28/2017 ADOPTING in full the 43 findings and recommendations filed 8/31/2017, and DENYING defendants' 34 motion to dismiss. (Yin, K)
August 31, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 43 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 08/31/17 recommending that defendants November 16,2016 motion to dismiss 34 be denied. Motion 34 referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
December 12, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/12/2016 ORDERING, within 14 days, plaintiff shall file either an opposition to the motion or a statment of no opposition to the motion to dismiss. (Yin, K)
October 24, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/24/2016 DENYING, without prejudice, plaintiff's 28 request for appointment of counsel and for a Spanish language interpreter. (Yin, K)
August 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER AND WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM ISSUED signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/16/2016 ORDERING the custodian to produce Ernesto Berrera #F-75691, to testify in USDC at 9:00 a.m. on 10/27/2016 in courtroom #25, before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman; custodian is ordered to notify the court of any change in custody of this inmate and is ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ. (cc: KJN, OTCD-SAC) (Yin, K)
January 27, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Ernesto Berrera signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/27/2016. CDCR shall collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in monthly payments and forward to the Clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDCR. The Clerk shall also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDCR, Financial)(Yin, K)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Berrera v. Sivyer et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ernesto Berrera
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. Sivyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. Macomber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?