Buffkin v. Fisk
Joseph Buffkin |
J. Fisk |
2:2015cv00802 |
April 14, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Amador |
Edmund F. Brennan |
Morrison C. England |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/16/16 ORDERING that the deadline for disclosure of expert witness information is extended to March 17, 2016; The deadline for completion of discovery, including the filing of discovery motions, is extended to May 16, 2016; and all other deadlines contained in the Status (Pretrial) Scheduling Order, including the trial date of October 3, 2016, are unchanged.(Dillon, M) |
Filing 21 ORDER AND WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM ISSUED signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/14/2016 ORDERING the custodian to produce Joseph Buffkin #V-95979, to testify in USDC at 9:00 A.M. on March 3, 2016 in courtroom 1, before Mag istate Judge Craig M. Kellison; custodian is ordered to notify the court of any change in custody of this inmate and is ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ. (cc: CMK, OTCD-SAC) (3 Certified copies served by mail on MCSP Warden) (Yin, K) |
Filing 19 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/4/2016 MODIFYING the Status (Pretrial) Scheduling Order. The deadline for disclosure of expert witness information is EXTENDED to 2/18/2016; the deadline for completion of discovery, including the filing of discovery motions, is EXTENDED to 4/15/2016. All other deadlines contained in the 13 Staus (Pretrial) Scheduling Order, including the trial date of 10/3/2016 are unchanged.(Yin, K) |
Filing 17 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/6/15. (Dillon, M) |
Filing 8 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 05/27/15 ordering on or before 6/26/15, the parties shall file status reports. The clerk of the court is directed to serve on all parties the "Notice of availability of a Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction." All parties shall complete and execute the form and file it with the clerk. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 4 ORDER SCREENING COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. §1915A signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/28/15. The complaint states a cognizable claim for relief under section 1983 against defendant Fisk for use of excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment, as well as state law claims for battery and negligence; and The Clerk shall issue a summons and any appropriate new civil case documents.(Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Buffkin v. Fisk | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Joseph Buffkin | |
Represented By: | Gail F. Flatt |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: J. Fisk | |
Represented By: | R. Lawrence Bragg |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.