Bradbury v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. et al
| Mark Bradbury |
| Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., Bank of New York Mellon and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc. |
| 2:2015cv00840 |
| April 20, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 01/13/16 ORDERING that plaintiff's 5 Motion for Notice of Lis Pendens is DENIED without prejudice; plaintiff's 24 Motion to Strike is DENIED without p rejudice and defendants' 29 Motion to Strike is DENIED without prejudice and the 02/10/16 hearing date is VACATED and RECOMMENDING that MERS and Countrywide's 13 Motion to Dismiss be granted in part and the complaint be dismissed without prejudice for a lack of subject matter jurisdiction and case closed. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections to these F&Rs due within 14 days. (Benson, A)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 07/17/15 ORDERING that the 11 Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED; the 07/24/15 hearing on 9 Bank of New York Mellon's Motion to Dismiss is RESET for 8/28/2015 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Benson, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
