ATAIN Specialty Insurance Company v. Hudson Insurance Company et al
| ATAIN Specialty Insurance Company |
| Hudson Insurance Company, Sierra Log Homes, Larry Trimboli and Sheri Trimboli |
| 2:2015cv00869 |
| April 22, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Butte |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Troy L. Nunley |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 07/23/15 ORDERING that per 24 Stipulation, the time for the parties to file a Joint Status Report and to exchange initial disclosures is EXTENDED 30 days to 08/24/15. (Benson, A)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 6/25/2015 ORDERING 18 The time for the parties to confer pursuant to Rule 26(f) of the FRCP (and all related dates under Rule 26(a) and (d)) and to confer regarding the matters set forth in the Order Requiring Joint Status Report shall be EXTENDED for 28 days to 7/10/2015. The time for the parties to file a Joint Status Report shall be EXTENDED for 28 days to 7/24/2015. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
6
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 5/12/15 ORDERING that Hudson shall have a 21-day extension to and including June 9, 2015, to respond to Atain's complaint in this matter. (Becknal, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
