McElroy v. Asad et al
| Jabbari McElroy |
| N Asad, K. Turner, CDCR, Flory, Colter and A. Pereira |
| 2:2015cv00904 |
| April 27, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Del Norte |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| John A. Mendez |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/23/15 ORDERING that the June 17, 2015 findings and recommendations (ECF No. 5 ) are vacated; Plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 7 ) is denied; and this action is dismissed without prejudice to re-filing upon pre-payment of the $400filing fee.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/16/15 ORDERING that the Clerk is directed to randomly assign a United StatesDistrict Judge to this case. It is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Randomly assigned and referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 05/11/15 ordering plaintiff has 30 days from the date of service of this order to submit either the filing fee or the application required by section 1915(a). The clerk of the court shall mail to plaintiff a form application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Plummer, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
