Taylor v. Amrein et al
| Jeffrey Lamont Taylor |
| C. R. Amrein, M. Champius and Andre |
| 2:2015cv00983 |
| May 6, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Kings |
| Carolyn K. Delaney |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 9/2/15 ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 7/8/2015 GRANTING plaintiff's 8 request to proceed IFP. Plaintiff shall pay the $350.00 filing fee in accordance with the concurrent CDCR order. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED and plaintiff has 30 days to file an amended complaint. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/4/2015 ORDERING plaintiff to submit, within 30 days, a certified trust account statement; and the Clerk shall send plaintiff a new ifp application. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 05/12/15 ordering plaintiff shall submit within 30 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the clerk of the court or the required fees in the amount of $400.00. The clerk of the court shall send plaintiff a new application to proceed in forma pauperis by a prisoner. (Plummer, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
