Katyal v. Donahoe et al
Plaintiff: Prashant Katyal
Defendant: Patrick R. Donahoe and United States Postal Services
Case Number: 2:2015cv01021
Filed: May 11, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge: Troy L. Nunley
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 12, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 31 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/12/2017 RECOMMENDING that the 13 Motion for Summary Judgment be granted, the clerk enter judgment for the defendant and close the case. Objection due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. (Donati, J)
April 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/13/17 ORDERING that Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 21 ) is DENIED; the hearing on defendant's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 13 ) is CONTINUED to 5/ 24/17; Plaintiff shall file either an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion no later than 5/10/17; Failure to file an opposition to the motion will be deemed a statement of non-opposition thereto, and will result in a recommendati on that defendant's motion be granted and/or the action be dismissed for lack of prosecution and/or for failure to comply with court orders and this court's Local Rules; Defendant may file a reply to plaintiff's opposition, if any, on or before 5/17/17. (Becknal, R)
March 7, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/6/17 ORDERING that: Plaintiff's request for an extension of time to respond to defendant's motion for summary judgment 19 is GRANTED; the hearing on defendant's motion for summary judgment 13 is continued to 4/26/17; Plaintiff shall file an opposition to the motion, or a statement of non-opposition thereto, no later than 4/12/17; Failure to file an opposition to the motion will be deemed a statement of non-oppositi on thereto, and may result in a recommendation that defendant's motion be granted and/or the action be dismissed for lack of prosecution and/or for failure to comply with court orders and this court's Local Rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Defendant may file a reply to plaintiff's opposition, if any, on or before 4/19/17. (Becknal, R)
February 7, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/9/17 ORDERING that the 1/13/17 Order to Show Cause 15 is DISCHARGED and no sanctionsare imposed; Plaintiff's Request for an extension of time to respond to defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 16 is GRANTED; the hearing on defendants Motion for Summary Judgment 13 is CONTINUED to 3/15/17; Plaintiff shall file an opposition to the motion, or a statement of non-opposition thereto, no later than 3/1/17; Failure to file an opposition to the motion will be deemed a statement of non-opposition thereto, and may result in a Recommendation that defendant's motion be granted and/or the action be dismissed for lack of prosecution and/or for failure to comply with courtorders and this court's Local Rules; Defendant may file a reply to plaintiff's opposition, if any, on or before 3/8,/17. (Becknal, R)
January 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/13/2017. ORDERING the 13 Motion for Summary Judgment CONTINUED to 2/15/2017 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. Plaintiff shall show caus e, in writing, no later than 2/1/2017 why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to timely file an opposition or a statement of non opposition. Plaintiff shall file an opposition to the motion, or a statement of non-opposition no later than 2/1/ 2017. Failure of plaintiff to file an opposition will be deemed a statement of non-opposition, and may result in a recommendation that defendants motion be granted or that this action be dismissed. Defendant may file a reply to plaintiff's opposition, if any, on or before 2/8/2017.(Washington, S)
January 6, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/6/2016 GRANTING plaintiff's 2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Clerk shall send plaintiff 1 USM-285 form, a copy of 1 Complaint, Judge Brennan's Scheduling Order, and the New C ivil Case Documents. Plaintiff shall supply U.S. Marshal, within 14 days from date of Order's filed date, all information needed to effect service of process and file Statement with Court that said documents have been sent. Clerk shall serve a copy of Order on U.S. Marshal. [cc: U.S. Marshal Services] (Marciel, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Katyal v. Donahoe et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Prashant Katyal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Patrick R. Donahoe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Postal Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?