Khan v. Frauenheim

Khan v. Frauenheim

Petitioner:	Mustaq Ali Khan
Respondent:	S. Frauenheim
Case Number:	2:2015cv01050
Filed:	May 14, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office:	Sacramento Office
County:	Fresno
Presiding Judge:	Dale A. Drozd
Presiding Judge:	William B. Shubb
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 9, 2015	Filing 7 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/08/15 granting 6 Motion to Proceed IFP. Also, RECOMMENDING that that petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed for failure to state a cognizable claim for relief. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
May 26, 2015	Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/22/15 ORDERING that Petitioner shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee; petitioners failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed; and Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district.(Dillon, M)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 9, 2015

Filing 7 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/08/15 granting 6 Motion to Proceed IFP. Also, RECOMMENDING that that petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed for failure to state a cognizable claim for relief. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)

May 26, 2015

Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/22/15 ORDERING that Petitioner shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee; petitioners failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed; and Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district.(Dillon, M)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Khan v. Frauenheim
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Mustaq Ali Khan
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: S. Frauenheim
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?