Hawk v. CDCR, et al.,
Shawn Hawk |
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Shasta County, Sacramento County, City of Redding, Jeffery Beard and Ronald Rackley |
2:2015cv01060 |
May 14, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
San Joaquin |
Craig M. Kellison |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 10/21/15 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 10/21/15 ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court is directed to randomly assign a District Judge to this case and to update the docket to reflect the new case number. District Judge Troy L. Nunley has been randomly assigned to this case. The new case number is 2:15-cv-1060 TLN CMK.(Dillon, M) |
Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 6/22/15 ORDERING that Plaintiff shall submit on the form provided by the Clerk of the Court, within 30 days from the date of this order, a complete application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the appropriate filing fee; and The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new form Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (Dillon, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.