Arreola v. Pomazal et al
Plaintiff: Jose Arreola
Defendant: Andrew Pomazal, Lankford, J. Smith and Dhaliwal
Case Number: 2:2015cv01179
Filed: May 28, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Amador
Presiding Judge: Dale A. Drozd
Presiding Judge: John A. Mendez
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 25, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 44 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 7/24/17 recommending that defendant Pomazal's motion for summary judgment 38 be denied. Defendant Lankford's motion for summary judgment 37 be denied. Motions 37 , 38 referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
July 5, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 6/30/2017 ORDERING Plaintiff to file opposition, if any, to 37 Motion for Summary Judgment of defendant Dr. Lankford within 20 days of the date of this order. (Henshaw, R)
January 19, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 1/19/17 GRANTING 29 Motion for Extension of time. Defendant shall file his motion for summary judgment no later than April 3, 2017.(Dillon, M)
August 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 8/28/16 DENYING 19 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Dillon, M)
October 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Jose Arreola signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/8/2015. CDCR shall collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in monthly payments and forward to the Clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDCR. The Clerk shall also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDCR, Financial)(Yin, K)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Arreola v. Pomazal et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jose Arreola
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Pomazal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lankford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dhaliwal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?