Evans et al v. Nationstart Morgage, LLC
Richard L. Evans and Christine M. Evans |
Nationstar Morgage, LLC |
2:2015cv01213 |
June 5, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Gregory G. Hollows |
John A. Mendez |
All Other Real Property |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 12/14/15 recommending that this action be dismissed with prejudice. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 16 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 11/4/15 ORDERING that Plaintiff's amended complaint, filed 9/16/15 15 , is stricken; Defendant's Request for Judicial Notice, filed 7/22/15, 9 , is granted; Defendant's motion to dismiss and to strike, filed 7/22/15, 8 , is granted; The complaint is dismissed for the reasons discussed above, with leave to file an amended complaint within twenty-eight (28) days from the date of service of this Order; Plaintiff's mo tion for contempt, filed 7/20/15, 7 , is denied; Plaintiff is directed to serve defendant within 45 days of the date of this order, all process pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. Failure to effectuate service within the time prescribed will result in a recommendation of dismissal of this action. (Becknal, R) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.