Smith v. H.F.D. No. 55, Inc.
| Sabrina Smith |
| H.F.D No. 55, Inc. |
| 2:2015cv01293 |
| June 16, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/19/2018 ORDERING the court approves the settlement under PAGA. Plaintiff's individual claims and arbitration claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. The representative PAGA claim is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE the case. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
25
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 05/19/16 ORDERING that the case is STAYED pending arbitration, and all previously set deadlines and hearings are VACATED. The parties shall notify the court within 7 days of the arbitration completion. (Benson, A)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/19/16 ORDERING that The Hearing date on Defendant's Renewed Motion to Compel Arbitration 21 shall be moved from 5/6/16 to 6/3/2016 at 10:00 AM. The Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Confer ence shall be moved to the same date as the hearing on Defendant's Renewed Motion to Compel Arbitration, i.e., 6/3/16, at 10:00 am; The Joint Status Report shall be filed no later than 7 days prior to the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference or by 5/27/16; and Defendant will make Patti Thetgyi available for deposition by video conference at a date in May 2016 mutually-agreed upon by the parties and deponent.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/7/2016 STRIKING 9 Supplemental Brief; DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE 5 Motion to Compel; ORDERING that any renewed motion be heard by 5/6/2016; DENYING WITH PREJUDICE 5 Motion to Dismiss. (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 02/02/16 ORDERING that this case is temporarily STAYED pending the circuit court's decision whetherto grant the petition for a rehearing en banc, and in the event the petition is granted, pending issuance of an en banc opinion. The parties shall notify the court within seven days of any decision in Sakkab. CASE STAYED (Benson, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Smith v. H.F.D. No. 55, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: H.F.D No. 55, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Janel Royce Ablon |
| Represented By: | Julie A. Dunne |
| Represented By: | Elizabeth Staggs-Wilson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sabrina Smith | |
| Represented By: | Nicholas John Scardigli |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
