Stringfellow v. Price et al
Plaintiff: Robert Stringfellow
Defendant: Price, R. Mora, Martinez, Moore and Crawford
Case Number: 2:2015cv01314
Filed: June 19, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Kendall J. Newman
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 30, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/30/2016 GRANTING plaintiff's 32 motion to dismiss and this action is DISMISSED. CASE CLOSED.(Yin, K)
June 21, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/21/16 ORDERING that defendants notify this court, within seven days, whether they have any objection to the dismissal of this action. Should defendants fail to respond, plaintiff's request will be granted pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2).(Dillon, M)
December 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/14/15 DENYING 20 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Dillon, M)
December 11, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/11/15 ORDERING that defendant Price is dismissed from this action without prejudice. (Dillon, M)
November 4, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/4/15 ORDERING that the October 28, 2015 order and judgment (ECF Nos. 15 & 16 ) are VACATED; Plaintiffs motion for extension of time (ECF No. 17 ) is GRANTED; and Plaintiff is granted 30 days in which to file an amended complaint or submit the documents described in the courts July 21, 2015 order. No further extensions of time will be granted.(Dillon, M)
October 28, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/28/15 ordering this action is dismissed without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M)
September 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/14/15 ORDERING that Plaintiffs September 3, 2015 motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 11 ) is GRANTED; Plaintiff is granted 30 days from the date of this order in which to file a third ame nded complaint; The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 10 ) are VACATED; The Clerk of the Court is directed to remove the assignment of this case to a district judge; and Plaintiffs motion for the appointment of counsel (ECF No. 12 ) is DENIED without prejudice. (cc KJM)(Dillon, M)
September 1, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/31/2015 DIRECTING the Clerk to assign a district judge to this cas; AND RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections due within 14 days.(Yin, K)
August 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/6/2015 DENYING without prejudice plaintiff's 7 and 8 motions for appoint of counsel. (Yin, K)
July 21, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Robert Stringfellow signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/21/2015. CDCR shall collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in monthly payments and forwa rd to the Clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDCR. The Clerk shall also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDCR, Financial)(Yin, K)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stringfellow v. Price et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Stringfellow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Price
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R. Mora
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Martinez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Crawford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?