Kononov v. Sacramento County Sheriff Department et al
| Vitaly V. Kononov |
| Sacramento County Sheriff Department, Sacramento County Main Jail, Scott R. Jones and John McGinness |
| 2:2015cv01324 |
| June 19, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Craig M. Kellison |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 7/6/2017 RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 05/12/17 granting 12 Motion to Proceed IFP. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed with leave to amend. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint within 30 days of the date of service of this order. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 12/14/15 ordering plaintiff shall submit on the form provided by the clerk of the court, within 30 days from the date of this order, a completed application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, or the appropriate filing fee. The clerk of the court shall send plaintiff a new application to proceed in forma pauperis. (Plummer, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
