Miller v. Frauenheim
Petitioner: Brad Robert Miller
Respondent: Scott Frauenheim
Case Number: 2:2015cv01365
Filed: June 26, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Carolyn K. Delaney
Presiding Judge: John A. Mendez
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 4/9/19 DENYING 53 Motion to Appoint Counsel & Proceed IFP. (Coll, A)
March 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 50 MEMORANDUM, OPINION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 3/22/19 DENYING 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and DECLINING to issue a Certificate of Appealability. Any further request for a Certificate of Appealability must be addressed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. CASE CLOSED. (Coll, A)
October 21, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/21/16 ordering that within seven days from the date of this order respondent shall file and serve an answer to the petition for writ of habeas corpus or a motion to dismiss and shall show cause in writing why sanctions should not be imposed for the failure to file the answer or motion to dismiss timely. (Plummer, M)
May 23, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 5/20/16 ADOPTING IN FULL 24 Findings and Recommendations; GRANTING 22 Petitioner's Motion to Stay as follows: The amended petition (ECF No. 18) is DISMISSED as "mixed." No later t han 30 days after dismissal, petitioner shall file a second amended petition containing only exhausted claims (Claims 2 and 3). Failure to timely file such an amended petition will result in this action being closed. Upon receipt of a fully ex hausted second amended petition, that court will administratively stay this action pursuant to Kelly, pending exhaustion of Claim 1 in the California Supreme Court; GRANTING as consistent with the above 21 Respondent's Motion to Dismiss; D ENYING as inconsistent with this order 25 Petitioner's Motion to amend traverse. The action is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings, including review of the proposed Second Amended Petition (ECF No. 28). (Jackson, T)
March 18, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 24 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 3/18/2016 RECOMMENDING that petitioner's 22 motion for stay be granted as follows: a. The amended petition 18 is dismissed as "mixed"; b. No later t han 30 days after dismissal, petitioner shall file a second amended petition containing only exhausted claims (Claims 2 and 3); c. Failure to timely file such an amended petition will result in this action being closed; and d. Upon receipt of a f ully exhausted second amended petition, that court will administratively stay this action pursuant to Kelly, pending exhaustion of Claim 1 in the California Supreme Court; and respondent's 21 motion to dismiss be granted as consistent with the above. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
January 20, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/20/16 granting 17 Motion to Amend. This action shall proceed on the First Amended Petition 18 . Respondent is directed to file a response to petitioner's amended habeas petition within 30 days from the date of this order. (Plummer, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Miller v. Frauenheim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Brad Robert Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Scott Frauenheim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?