Pelling v. Amtrak et al
| Leslie Pelling |
| Amtrak and City of Sacramento |
| 2:2015cv01378 |
| June 29, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
STIPULATED ORDER FOR DISMISSAL signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 1/3/18. The Court accordingly DISMISSES Plaintiff Leslie Pelling's Civil Complaint in United States District Court, Case Number 2:15-CV-01378- MCE-KJN against De fendant City of Sacramento, with prejudice. Plaintiff Leslie Pelling and Defendant City of Sacramento each shall waive and bear their own costs, expenses, and attorneys fees with respect to any claims they have or had against each other. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
19
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 1/10/2017 DISMISSING with prejudice Defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation, service mark AMTRAK, erroneously sued and served as Amtrak, Inc. only. The Court also dismisses Cross-Claimant National Railroad Passenger Corporation, service mark AMTRAK, cross-claim against City of Sacramento. The City of Sacramento shall not file any adverse action against National Railroad Passenger Corporation. (Washington, S)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/19/2016 DENYING without prejudice plaintiff's 2 , 5 applications to proceed IFP. Within 28 days, plaintiff shall pay the filing fee or file an amended application demonstrating her ent itlement to proceed IFP if she can do so in good faith in light of the court's observations stated within this order. Plaintiff's failure to pay the filing fee or file an amended application by the above deadline will result in a recommendation that plaintiff's complaint be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). This matter is REFERRED back to the presiding disrict judge for further proceedings. (Yin, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
